Bootstrap
  C.R.T. .com
It doesn't have to be difficult if someone just explains it right.

Welcome to ChineseRemainderTheorem.com!

×

Modal Header

Some text in the Modal Body

Some other text...

Use the calculator below to get a step-by-step calculation of the Chinese Remainder Theory. Just enter the numbers you would like and press "Calculate" .


This removes all numbers from the textboxes, such that you can fill in your own.

This fills all textboxes with random numbers. If you fill in random numbers yourself, it is very likely that those numbers do not have a solution. To avoid disappointment, use this button instead! It only uses random numbers that do have a solution.

This button is similar to the "Clear everything" button, but only clears the left column.
This is useful if you want your equations to be of the form x ≡ a (mod m) rather than bx ≡ a (mod m).
In that case, it can be especially useful after using the random numbers button.

Do you want to use more equations? Go ahead and use this button. It adds another row that you can fill in. Not sure what numbers to put in this newly added row? Use the random numbers button again!

Do you have too many rows? Use one of these buttons to remove a row. You can always add a row again using the yellow "Add a row" button.

Are you ready to view a full step-by-step Chinese Remainder Theorem calculation for the numbers you have entered? Then use this button!

Want to know more?


Transform the equations

You used one or more of the fields on the left, so your equations are of the form bx ≡ a mod m.
We want them to be of the form x ≡ a mod m, so we need to move the values on the left to the right side of the equation.
For a more detailed explanation about how this works, see this part of our page about how to execute the Chinese Remainder algorithm.

First, we calculate the inverses of the leftmost value on each row:

nbqr t1t2t3
146301010
46314630101
So our multiplicative inverse is 0 mod 1 ≡ 0
Source: ExtendedEuclideanAlgorithm.com

nbqr t1t2t3
857576128101-1
5762812141-13
28114201-13-61
1411403-61857
So our multiplicative inverse is -61 mod 857 ≡ 796
Source: ExtendedEuclideanAlgorithm.com

nbqr t1t2t3
29252029010
25229820101
29201901-1
209221-13
9241-13-13
21203-1329
So our multiplicative inverse is -13 mod 29 ≡ 16
Source: ExtendedEuclideanAlgorithm.com

Click on any row to reveal a more detailed calculation of each multiplicative inverse.

Now that we now the inverses, let's move the leftmost value on each row to the right of the equation:

x ≡ 746 × 463-1 (mod 1) ≡ 746 × 0 (mod 1) ≡ 0 (mod 1)
x ≡ 617 × 576-1 (mod 857) ≡ 617 × 796 (mod 857) ≡ 71 (mod 857)
x ≡ 815 × 252-1 (mod 29) ≡ 815 × 16 (mod 29) ≡ 19 (mod 29)


Now the actual calculation

  1. Find the common modulus M
    M = m1 × m2 × ... × mk = 1 × 857 × 29 = 24853
  2. We calculate the numbers M1 to M3
    M1=M/m1=24853/1=24853,   M2=M/m2=24853/857=29,   M3=M/m3=24853/29=857
  3. We now calculate the modular multiplicative inverses M1-1 to M3-1
    Have a look at the page that explains how to calculate modular multiplicative inverse.
    Using, for example, the Extended Euclidean Algorithm, we will find that:

    nbqr t1t2t3
    12485301010
    248531248530101
    So our multiplicative inverse is 0 mod 1 ≡ 0
    Source: ExtendedEuclideanAlgorithm.com

    nbqr t1t2t3
    85729291601-29
    29161131-2930
    161313-2930-59
    1334130-59266
    3130-59266-857
    So our multiplicative inverse is 266 mod 857 ≡ 266
    Source: ExtendedEuclideanAlgorithm.com

    nbqr t1t2t3
    29857029010
    857292916101
    291611301-1
    1613131-12
    13341-12-9
    31302-929
    So our multiplicative inverse is -9 mod 29 ≡ 20
    Source: ExtendedEuclideanAlgorithm.com
  4. Now we can calculate x with the equation we saw earlier
    x = (a1 × M1 × M1-1   +   a2 × M2 × M2-1   + ... +   ak × Mk × Mk-1)   mod M
    =  (0 × 24853 × 0 +
       71 × 29 × 266 +
       19 × 857 × 20)   mod 24853
    = 3499 (mod 24853)


    So our answer is 3499 (mod 24853).


Verification

So we found that x ≡ 3499
If this is correct, then the following statements (i.e. the original equations) are true:
463x (mod 1) ≡ 746 (mod 1)
576x (mod 857) ≡ 617 (mod 857)
252x (mod 29) ≡ 815 (mod 29)

Let's see whether that's indeed the case if we use x ≡ 3499.